Visit our Re-post guidelines
You can download this flyer: Kirpan vs Pandemic (?).
Dr. Fauci NEJM Editorial Suggests That COVID-19 Fatality Rates May Be 10x Lower Than Official Projections
Tuesday, March 31st 2020 at 6:45 pm
Dr. Fauci, whose guidance to President Trump has resulted in a near total lockdown of the country, recently published an editorial in New England Journal of Medicine that rightly points out serious flaws in his own doom-and-gloom COVID-19 fatality projections.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the guiding force behind President Trump’s recent order to extend social distancing guidelines another 14 days toward the end of April; social distancing guidelines that require maintaining “shelter-in-place” quarantines and extrending the shut down of millions of businesses and livelihoods which have already suffered irreparable and potentially catastrophic consequences.
It has been the president and mainstream media’s seemingly unquestioning confidence in the accuracy of Dr. Fauci’s projections which led Trump to announce on March 15th that he would adopt Dr. Fauci’s aggressive strategy of locking down the country for 14-days in order to prevent what he warned could be 1.7 million Americans fatalities from COVID-19 if his advice was not heeded.
Yet, in a strange turn of events, an editorial authored by Dr. Fauci and published online on February 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine titled, “Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted,” points out that, while at present, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%, these statistics are based on case definitions requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, i.e., only those who are acutely ill with pneumonia are counted as COVID-19 infected, and not the potentially vast pool of individuals who are asymptomatic carriers or are only suffering from mild symptoms. His paper elaborates further on this point:
In fact. Dr. Fauci suggests the case fatality rate might be as low as 0.1%.
Dr. Fauci’s paper rightly points out the likelihood that there is a massive submerged iceberg of asymptomatic or mild cases of COVID-19 that have gone completely unacknowledged and untested, and that therefore the death toll from COVID-19 is more akin to seasonal influenza at 0.1%.
Given these facts, how can the dominant narrative any longer be unquestionably maintained, namely, that we are all facing a deadly pandemic that requires the total suspension of all our basic civil liberties to combat, while at the time causing potentially catastrophic effects to the socioeconomic and psychobiological health of hundreds of Americans, amplified by what is an irrational and media-hyped fear and panic? Learn more and take action at Stand for Health Freedom and their most recent campaign: Could Unchecked Government Power Be More Dangerous than the Threat of Infectious Disease?
To learn more about the highly confusing and flawed COVID-19 testing methodologies read: Op-Ed: Does the 2019 Coronavirus Exist?
To learn more about the misleading fatality projections, read COVID-19 – Evidence Over Hysteria.
Additionally, please watch and share James Corbett’s important video on the topic below:
[My edit for Youtube link: What’s Up With The Italian Mortality Rate? – Questions For Corbett]
•Mar 31, 2020
The following links are just a few of the many on his blog – Click on: https://nomorefakenews.com
Jan29 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport January 29, 2020
Jan30 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport January 30, 2020
Who is pushing the IDEA of an epidemic, and what is the payoff?
Jan30 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport January 30, 2020
Feb23 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport February 23, 2020
Feb24 by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport February 24, 2020
You can download the above flyer as a PDF.
This is posted in the spirit of celebrating Guru Nanak’s 550th anniversary in 2019.
AMRITSAR: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday made a surprise visit to Sri Harmandir Sahib (Golden Temple), where he knelt and bowed five times before Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji and also served langar.
Wearing a woollen cap, he moved around the sarvoar’s parikrama, which is nearly a kilometre-and-half long, in about 10 minutes.
He was accompanied by Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani, Punjab chief minister Parkash Singh Badal, his son and deputy chief minister Sukhbir Badal and Harsirmat Kaur Badal.
Modi and Afghan President were honored with Siropa. This time, no one denied siropa to anyone from the Badal family as well.
As per the Sikh code of conduct, everyone has to cover his or her head with cloth and remove their shoes before entering the premises. It may be recalled that British monarch Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Phillip had visited Harmandir Sahib in October 1997, and at that time, the Queen wore socks and covered her head with a hat.
Previously, In a proposal to make US President Barrack Obama visit Darbar Sahib wearing cap, SGPC had given official statement saying that “We are only concerned with that one should cover his or her head as per the Sikh code of conduct”.
I write this critique on the basis of good conscience, due diligence and good reason. Where does it say in the book guru, that one must cover one’s head when entering a gurdwara or when being with your guru (teacher)? If you are with a teacher and you become his or her student, then what is the necessity of covering your head? Does it help with learning? Teenagers who attend high school or for that matter, college or university students, are not obligated to cover their heads. No one insists that this be done. Teachers from other religions do not insist this be done. So, why do Sikhs focus on this issue when it does not hold any water? Baba Nanak never made a point of it. He wore a topi, too. Since his 550th birth anniversary is being celebrated in 2019, it’s time we paid attention to the logic contained in his message. If we don’t, then like he used to do, he’ll point out our hypocrisy ∼ Pritam Singh.
This two-page, double-sided flyer is posted online at:
You can download it as a PDF.
Your reply to my post is typical of the people who are mind-controlled and members of a cult. I used to be one too but this was when I was an Amritdhari. There are all kinds of cults. If you go to the website of Rick Alan Ross – https://www.culteducation.com/, you will find many examples. In particular, he has many articles relating to the 3HO, Yogi Bhajan and Sikhism. Just use these search terms.
Whereas my post is a critique of what Jagraj has said and is based upon using good logic and reasoning, your reply provides none.
In what you wrote, there are many examples that provide the evidence of your cult-like thinking and bad logic and reasoning.
For example, as you say “the hate that you have for a religion, here Sikhism” is merely what you perceive as the result of your delusional and cult-like thinking. Thus, you see hatred in what I’ve said with regard to my critique of what Jagraj has said but in actual fact, there is none to be found. And nor will you find any hatred at my blog, too.
Then, when you say “Going to a living guru who is in a human form is not in Sikhism, unless you’re a Radhaswami or Naamdhari or from some other sects.” you obviously have missed the boat.
When Baba Nanak was alive, he was a human guru wasn’t he? Just try imagining applying what you said, to him. Try visualizing just for a moment, if the people of Nanak’s time were to reject him because they already had books and books of religious writings (which they did) and considered all of those to be a living guru!
I used to believe that the Guru Granth Sahib is a living guru. You can read more about this at my website. Now add to this the notion that they are not allowed to, as I will paraphrase using your words “Going to a living guru who is in a human form is not” allowed in Hinduism.
If people of Nanak’s time had been programmed to never go to a human guru (teacher), and this was a part of their religion, then imagine just how much mileage Guru Nanak would have obtained.
I suggest that you and others who don’t know they’ve been mind-controlled, read “Custom-manufactured deceptions used in Sikh mind-control.” It is never too late to awaken from a being a prisoner of mind-control.
I will also post this on my blog and to the Basics of Sikhi channel.
Recently, I came upon the YouTube channel “Sikhism Exposed” and other related sites. While reading many topics that initially seemed to be quite controversial, I sensed an energy of anger and even thoughts of “We want to kill him.” I searched the net for the term “How to argue with an atheist” and found a couple of useful sites. Then, I visited my local library and obtained “God is not great. How religion poisons everything.”
On the channel “Sikhism is a mind controlling DISEASE” I decided to explore in more detail the actual YouTube video of Jagraj speaking. It is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Gods Word – Response to “Dawah Man questions Basics of Sikhi”
At the 39:24 time mark, Jagraj says:
“In Guru Granth Sahib ji, you cannot find chapters upon certain topics. If you go to the Koran Sharif, if you go to other texts, you’ll be able to find the chapter that talks about certain thing or certain thing. You cannot find that in Guru Granth Sahib ji. It’s everything everywhere. Yeah, at all times. You might say why is that? Sadh sangat ji because it’s the guru. A sikh has to learn from the guru not the Sikh chooses what to learn from the guru. If you are somebody who goes to the Bible or Koran, you can choose what chapter to read and that’s it. You get the gyan that you wanted. You get the gyan that you wanted. You don’t get to choose, the guru doesn’t get to choose what to teach you, you’re choosing what to learn from the guru. But in Guru Granth Sahib ji maharaj, you don’t get to choose what to learn, you get to listen to what guru sahib wants you to learn. They’re in control all the time. [In Punjabi: This is a very bareek (subtle) thing to understand.] Maharaj is in control of our learning. We are not in control of our learning. How can we choose what to learn from the guru, guru sahib is Devan dev, raajan raj, etc.? They are so amazing, (bhana na bhan) they are the one in charge. They are the one in charge. That’s why Bani, doesn’t let you choose what to learn. Bani tells you what it would teach you because Bani Guru, Guru hea bani. It’s in charge.”
This is my response.
On the subject of learning, Jagraj has undermined the very principles that all learning is based upon. In his quest to promote so-called “Sikhi”, he does not seem to be aware of the mind-control that he, himself has been subjected to and is passing on to others on his channel. When I examine the logic behind what he is saying, I am forced to agree with Sikhism Exposed but I wouldn’t call it a “disease.” It is something much worse.
I have a lived experience from growing up in the Sikh community. This includes being an Amritdhari, maintaining a newspaper clipping file of Sikh articles from 1960 to 1986, audio recordings of political speeches given by various Sikh leaders who came to Toronto, hundreds of hours of audio recordings of Sant Singh Maskeen as well as various sants and raagi jathas; working with Dr. Jarnail Singh of The Sikh Social and Educational Society, and working as an Editor of the Sikh News and Views, the society’s quarterly newsletter during the year he suffered a heart attack (I have 25 years of issues), articles that I wrote for the newsletter, photograph album and VHS video covering the TV news reporting of the massacre of Sikhs in 1984; have worn the turban for over 28 years and have obtained the first legal precedent on the wearing of the kirpan in the history of Canada.
A teacher can teach a student. This teaching is based upon a curriculum. A student usually knows what kind of subjects or topics are included in that curriculum. Teachers usually attend Teacher’s College and receive the requisite training. Before they actually start teaching in schools or if they are university professors, there is a process they must go through and become credentialed. This is the arrangement that everyone is familiar with.
Jagraj says “…you don’t get to choose what to learn, you get to listen to what guru (teacher) sahib wants you to learn.” I say, how would one know what guru sahib wants you to learn? Just to give guru sahib benefit of the doubt, if he knows what he wants you to learn, then how does he communicate this with his student (sikh)?
If the guru were alive, like the teachers or professors we have in schools and universities, then the communication would be a two-way street. But the truth is that the Sikh (individual) cannot receive direction from a source (or other reference material) that is laden with cobwebs from the dusts of time.
The gurus died a long time ago. What they wrote is in the form of a book and Jagraj should have known better than to go backwards in time, trying to resuscitate that which has been dead for a long time.
The direction he offers is based upon an illusion of a centuries-old so-called “Sikhi” that was a product for that time period.
The book guru is merely a book and like all books, it requires some training in how to read it. There was a time when I couldn’t read or speak Punjabi and it was when there was no Internet. Though I would attend gurdwara with my father, I never could understand anything. In that time period, guru sahib didn’t jump out from anywhere and teach me. These days, one can do searches on the net at www.sriggranth.org and many other sites. But again, it requires effort from an individual that has the motivation to do so.
Now continuing with my critique of what he says, when you do the listening, you still have an element of choice. You can tell the teacher that you didn’t understand what he wanted you to learn. Then, the teacher would have to respond. On the other hand, the teacher can tell if you didn’t understand what he wanted you to learn. That’s how teachers who are alive in a human body, work. There is no exception for any guru (teacher).
The conundrum is that Sikhs regard their scripture as a “Guru” and are commanded that they are not to go to any human living guru. This is absolute mind-control. When they go to a gurdwara, they pay obeisance to it by bowing their heads and placing coins into a money box.
There was time in my development when I use to tell people, “It is a living guru whereas the other world’s scriptures are not.” I felt that our holy book was superior to that of other faiths. My mind used to be conditioned and brainwashed. I am not that ignorant anymore.
The only saving grace that I offer is that which is based upon the term “bibek daan.” In the ardas (congregational prayer) of the Sikhs, they ask the Creator for some boons. Out of the whole lot, they say that “Naam daan” is the one to top it off. It is considered the supreme gift or boon. My contention is that bibek daan is the most significant one. I’ll give an example of what I mean.
How would one know whether or not any of the daans (boons) that are being asked for, need to be included? One would know this by relying upon bibek daan: To be able to distinguish between good or bad information. It is one’s ability to discriminate or discern the difference between two kinds of information.
One’s ability to discern is akin to using good logic. If one cannot do this, then whatever (bad) information one relies upon can lead to the wrong conclusion.
If one does not know whether the information one has used is good or bad, then the result will show this. I contend that this part of the ardas is using logic that makes the daana sir daan naam daan invalid. The way I look at it, it should be daana sir daan bibek daan. Why? Because if you don’t have bibek daan to begin with, then you will have no way to validate the conclusion. In this case, the conclusion of naam daan defeats the logic validated upon the principle of bibek daan. It should be daana sir daan bibek daan. And in that bibek daan, I would include the reading and study of Christopher Hitchens book. I might also add a quote from the book, “Heretic. Why Islam needs a reformation Now” by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. “Al-ansari has called for a fundamental overhaul of educational systems in the Islamic world to encourage critical thinking. He has called for Arab freethinkers to be able to sue inflammatory Islamic preachers for harm that befalls them as a result of their sermons. 28.” Page 247.
From my site, I paraphrase that “In India, all learning whether spiritual or in the various sciences, has always been backed by a long-standing tradition. This is known as the Guru-Shishya tradition.”
But Jagraj wants you to ignore the norm of school and university teachers and professors and the Guru-Shishya tradition. He wants you to leave the real world that we all live in. He wants you to jump into his cult-like domain that is an illusion based upon his erroneous understanding of the so-called “Sikhi” that he finds himself locked in. In that domain, he is advocating total and absolute mind-control. His logic and reasoning is suspect. Since he has passed on, I urge his followers to take heed. I will also post this on my site and to the Basics of Sikhi channel.
Today, I replied to some posts at the youtube channel “Sikhism Exposed” under the topic “Sikhism is a mind controlling DISEASE“.
3 weeks ago
How does a ‘Sikh’ teen lying about an attack link to Sikhi converting children and brainwashing them? I accept the fact that many parents do this, I know a few myself, but that in itself does not follow Sikhi. Moreover, Prabhjot Kaur provided a relevant verse that refutes the arguement that Sikhs should (not don’t) not convert those who are unwilling. Guru Nanak’s own children did not accept Sikhi but he accepted that fact and moved on. He never tried to convert them or pester them. From these 2 pieces of evidence, the verse and an event in history, we can conclude that converting those who are unwilling to convert to Sikhi, which include children, are not allowed as per Sikh teaching.
Pritam Singh 19 minutes ago
In response to your question, please read the entire blog and particularly “Why do Sikh children commit suicide when they cannot cut their hair? What would compel them to do this?” https://assaultatdixiegurdwara.wordpress.com/suicide/
Sikhism Exposed 3 weeks ago (edited)
Yes the question you have to ask is why did the Sikh teen lie about getting attacked and getting his hair cut? Was it because he did not want long hair which was most likely forced upon him by his Sikh Parents? The answer most likely is yes… sikhism was forced upon him from a very very young age by his parents and he was desperately trying to free himself from the cult of sikhism and the only option he had was to stage an attack…… thinking… his parents will allow him to get a haircut due to harassment etc.. which will eventually free him from the 5Ks and become a free man.
Pritam Singh 18 minutes ago
Many Sikh teenagers create all kinds of drama for wanting to cut their hair. In addition to my blog, read the discussions on the topix forum, hair cut stories of sikh boys and girls.
Public Notice – Notice to all readers of this BLOG:
This BLOG/Website is subject to the following disclaimer.
This BLOG contains information that is offered under private trust. The information is educational in nature and is not intended to diagnose any physical or mental condition, to replace the services of a physician, or to be a substitute for the advice and treatment of a licensed professional. You should consult a physician in all matters relating to your health, and particularly in respect of any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical attention. The information is provided strictly “as is” and without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Please study and learn about your right to informed consent. Downloading from this BLOG constitutes acceptance of private trust terms. All private trust rights reserved.
The content of this BLOG/Website is subject to copyright. Any comments offered become the property of this BLOG/Website. If anyone may want to pursue litigation of any kind that involves any content from this site, they agree to have the matter dealt with in a Court of Equity in Ontario.
Any references made on this blog Assault at Dixie Gurdwara to articles from the news media or any photographs are used for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review, or news reporting and subject to Fair use and Fair dealing with a work requires neither the permission of the copyright owner nor payment of any royalties. Your use of this BLOG/website and its contents signifies that you agreed with the Public Notice and constitutes acceptance of the above terms. By Grantor: Pritam Singh.
On Monday, August 2, 2010, I was assaulted and terrorized at the Dixie gurdwara. Two boys, one in Grade 10 and the other in Grade 11, were also terrorized. Later that evening, I reported this to the Peel Police at the Bramalea Civic Centre.
This blog is dedicated to the two young Sikh boys that I had a discussion with at the old langar hall in Dixie gurdwara prior to being assaulted. After the discussion, I saw them sitting on chairs in the Committee (room) Office 12. They were terrorized and watched me being terrorized. I do not know the names of the two boys. If they should find this website, I urge them to contact me.
After a few days of contacting the Punjabi media, whom I thought may take interest, I realized they were uninterested. I thought that was quite odd. As I found this quite disturbing, I decided the best way to get my story out would be to write this blog. You can read more details about what happened: The 5 K’s of how I was terrorized.
When I began to write this blog, I started exploring the reasons why violence is so pernicious in the Sikh community, what causes it and how it can stop. Though my exploration was prompted by what happened to me, I’ve known about the long history of Sikh violence in Toronto. The first incident goes back to 1975 and this happened at the Pape Avenue gurdwara. Since then, Toronto Sikh violence has not only continued but evolved into a more sinister form as evidenced by the Osgoode Hall shooting by Kuldip Samra in 1982, the fight over eating food sitting on the floor or on tables in Vancouver (Moderates fight to retain power at Sikh temple) and the bombing of Air India in 1985. In addition to all this, there have been numerous blood-letting incidents in gurdwaras throughout USA and Canada.
Based upon my extensive participation in the Sikh community and after having lived the life of an Amritdhari Sikh, I have put disparate information together.
I have discovered that the violence is just one symptom among a plethora of cult-like behaviours perpetuated in the garb of religion.
Sikhs are participating in a cult but don’t know it. It may be called a ‘Sikh religion’ but if Baba Nanak was around, he would not refrain from calling it a cult. He had the guts to confront the evils of his time and was known to never mince his words. I chose this word because it most accurately describes how the people behave in this ‘religion’.
More information on “cults” can be found at: Cult News 3HO Archives.
The word ‘cult’ is also appropriate because it fits with the particular way that Baba Nanak used to challenge the people of his time. He challenged the believers of the various religions of his time by contrasting what they did and how they would justify it. The evidence of this can be found in his writings and the stories attributed to him. The way that he challenged was based upon using simple logic to contrast one thing with another. This can be summarized in the example about him at the place called Hardwar.
Hardwar is one of the Hindu pilgrimage places on the bank of river Ganges. The pilgrims got up early in the morning and bathed in the river. As the sun came out, they started throwing water towards the sun. When Guru Nanak asked them as to what they were doing, one priest replied, “We are offering water to our dead ancestors in the region of Sun to quench their thirst.” Upon this the Guru started throwing water towards the west. The pilgrims laughed and asked what he was doing. The Guru replied, “I am watering my fields in my village in the Punjab.” The priest asked, “How can your water reach such a distance?” The Guru retorted, “How far your ancestors are from here?” One of them replied, “in the other world.”
The Guru stated, “If the water cannot reach my fields which are about four hundred miles away from here, how can your water reach your ancestors who are not even on this earth?” The crowd stood in dumb realization. The Guru preached against superstitions and false rituals, worship of gods and goddesses, penances and renunciation. He stressed that only One God, the Formless, was to be glorified. In this way he showed the path of truth and enlightenment. There is a Gurdwara called Nanakdwara in Hardwar on the bank of the river Ganges where the Guru had stayed.
The above story can be seen as one example of how people at his time had been mind-controlled.
In every age people are mind-controlled. The family in which Guru Nanak was raised was no exception. The act of taking birth, growing up as a child, developing as a teenager, and into an adult, exposes everyone to mind-control. There are no exceptions to this. Before Nanak became known as a ‘Guru’, he too had been mind-controlled. One must be in the dark before one can appreciate the light. One must experience ignorance before becoming enlightened. This is why the word “Guru” is made up of two parts: “Gu” meaning darkness, and “ru” meaning light. Only the one, who has been in darkness and then becomes aware of this to the point of being enlightened, can become a “Guru”.
Religion is not and has not ever been able to take the place of a “Guru”. This is because religion itself is an entity devoid of life. It has no heartbeat and nor does it breath like a living man or woman. Religion has no consciousness. Religion cannot realize anything. Religion cannot develop self-awareness. Self-awareness is the exclusive domain of living beings. Religion is a textbook for performing mind-control. Sikhism is just another textbook tantamount to mind-control.
I’ve spent many years being a practicing Sikh. But I have never been an ordinary, run of the mill Sikh who goes to the gurdwara, says his prayers, eats the food and heads home. No, I am not like that and I have never been one.
The word Sikh is derived from the Sanskrit shishya meaning a seeker, a student, or learner. Throughout my life, I’ve always gone to the depth of understanding any subject. Like any true seeker, I sought information, all kinds of information. But when I began to seek information, I did not know how to discern whether that information was true or false. No one had taught me how to do this. Though I was never completely convinced by what I knew, I kept searching. As I found new information, I changed myself accordingly. I have always done the best that I can with whatever I knew at the time. But when I knew more, then that old information lost its value. As a result, I let it go.
Like every other parent, Nanak’s parents were doing the best they could with what they knew. This probably changed after they realized their son had abilities other children did not have.
While exploring Sikhism, I became fully immersed in the Sikh religious identity of a Khalsa, a step higher than being an ordinary Sikh. I became an Amritdhari Sikh and kept all the five religious symbols. The one that got everyone’s attention was the Kirpan and what I did to uphold my right to keep it.
Not only did I wear the Kirpan outside of my shirt (as most Sikhs did not) but I put myself on the line for my right to wear it. This occurred at the Workmen’s Compensation Board Rehabilitation Centre that used to be located in Downsview, Ontario. At that time, I not only believed in the principles behind the wearing of the Kirpan but also I suffered for them.
In 1979, I filed my case with the Ontario Human Rights Commission. My only concern was singularly focused upon upholding my right to wear the Kirpan. From the onset of my complaint to the time the case was adjudicated, I never received a single penny. After the case was won, it never occurred to me that I should have been compensated. I continued to suffer pain that resulted from an accident at work. Also, I never received any treatment for this. You might say this was odd but when one is that focused, one lives with the pain and suffering. In retrospect, I look back and now recognize that I too, was in a cult. If my elders had provided a little more balanced advice, I would have had my back treated. There are always other steps one can take to have the religious issues dealt with. Many times, I have noted that the elders allow individuals to make compromises but never tell the public of this fact.
When the court made its decision in 1981, this became the first legal precedent for the Kirpan in Canada.
I also have an unfinished manuscript of my experiences with some leaders and elders of the community at that time. It will give the reader a more in-depth look at how some of our people think and behave. I was young and naïve and gung-ho on fighting for my religious rights. I had no idea that I would do this all alone. I received no support from the community. When the decision came down in my favour, I noticed none of the elders or the leaders of my community at that time, called to congratulate me. I found that quite odd. I mean here I was fighting for not only my right but the right of all Sikhs to wear the Kirpan and no one thought it mattered. When you read my articles about how mind-control occurs in the Sikh community, this will not appear to be that odd.
In 1975, when I was a teenager, I never tasted violence myself but I did witness tempers flaring and blood boiling at the Pape Avenue gurdwara. Eventually, this led to a blood bath. Though I personally saw the tension building up in the weeks subsequent to the blood bath, I was not there to witness it. Little did I know there was going to be much more violence to come.
The fight for upholding my right to wear the Kirpan had me doing a lot of reading and research. Many Sikhs do not know and perhaps, do not care to know that I have the largest newspaper clipping file on the Sikhs of Toronto, going back to 1960. Plus, I have accumulated many 7 inch and 5 inch, reel to reel and over 500 cassette audio tape recordings of a number of political speeches, kirtan and kathas, and photographs from 1970 to 1990. Since then, I’ve kept current with many reports as they have appeared in the news media.